|
Presidential Elections 2008:
Democrats Do Their Best to Lose
by Howard Melamed
January 9, 2008 Coral
Springs: I am having a problem with the current
presidential primary elections concerning the slate of candidates
that the Democratic Party has put foreword. My only conclusion
is that the Democrats always try their very very best to lose an
election.
If you look back to the 2004
elections the Democrats decided that what the US population needed
was John Kerry. If you think about it, in a time where the
incumbent President Bush's popularity was at an all time low, Kerry
was overwhelmingly defeated. To some Democrats, it wasn't the
candidate, but rather a conspiracy that allowed the Republicans to
'stuff the ballots'. They used this excuse because no one
wants to face the facts and say ' we made a mistake with Kerry as
the candidate'. Kerry was a great debater, winning every TV
debate against Bush. Kerry was the smarter of the two.
Kerry had the Hollywood actors behind him. Kerry embraced
Michael Moore. Bottom line, Kerry was impossible to elect.
He was too left wing too liberal. He did not know how to play the middle, as
Bill Clinton did, to win over the undecided. Kerry lost,
because the democrats do their best to make sure that they lose.....by
not following the tried and tested formula developed by President
Bill Clinton.
Now we have the same thing going
on. Of course many will criticize me on this, saying I must be
biased, or I don't know what I am talking about. I can bet
anyone of them that if one of the current three top Democratic
candidates is chosen, the Dems will lose....again.
Hillary Clinton: The only qualification that
Hillary has is that she was in the White House and by osmosis, she
gained the knowledge through her husband Bill, of what a President
should do. There are many problems with this way of thinking.
First, sleeping with the president is different that being a
president. The only 'presidential' act that she tried to do was
reform healthcare, which she failed at miserably. She is a
Senator, and no senator has been elected since JFK. Americans
like governors. That is because a Governor at least knows how to
manage government. As well, as much as we would like to think
that the American voter is 'hip' to the times, I do not think that a
woman is going to be electable. Oh yes...we live in a different
time, but do you really believe that these different times
have no bigotry or condescending attitudes towards woman? In the end, the Republicans will crucify
her and Bill will only be able to help in the process.
Barack Hussein Obama : Are Americans willing
to elect a President whose middle name is 'Hussein'? How about if
Americans will let serve as commander and chief someone who never
served in any of the Armed Forces, or National Guard or even the
Coast Guard? Then there is the problem that Obama is still a child
in politics compared to anyone else that has ever ran for
office with the exception of Ross Perot and Pat Pulsen. He hasn't
even served a full 6 years as senator. Is he that vain to think that
he has enough experience to handle being President? The
world has seen its share of orators, including the bad ones.
Being able to make a great speech is different than being
presidential material. Kerry was a great speaker as well.
Bush wasn't . Bush won. Democrats lost. Finally, there are still a
large population of people that would vote against Obama just
because he is a man of color...again, if you think 'times are a
changin' then you obviously never listen to Imus in the morning.
The trouble is, for a Presidential Candidate you need to be able to
remove all of the negatives. In this case the negatives are the
bigots in the United States that will never go away.
John Edwards: You got to be kidding.
North Carolina Slip and Fall attorney. Not gonna happen. HE is also
a Senator, lost the bid with Kerry. He is un-electable.
As well, take a look at the
attention that the press is giving to two primaries that mean
absolutely nothing. Iowa? 2.9 million people. There are
people in Broward County. New Hampshire? 1.9 Million people.
Less than Fort Lauderdale. These two states are a
representative of the United States popular opinion as Coral Springs
to Florida. The candidates that win in these two states
are doing so for one purpose only: To be a big fish in a small bowl.
As we look into the future, we
need to ask the leadership of the Democratic party, "Is this the
best you could do? A wife, a kid , and a shark?
If ever the Democrats need Al Gore to come back it is now!
|