David Vs Goliath: Coral Springs Firm Takes on the
FCC
Coral Springs Fl - April
17, 2006 - CellAntenna Corporation headquartered in Coral Springs
Florida, announced today the filing of an action in the US District
Court of the Southern District of Florida challenging a law enforced
by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to prohibit the use
of cellular and radio frequency jamming equipment by state and local
governments.
CellAntenna argues that several
sections of the Federal Communications Act (FCA) of 1934 violate the
14th amendment of the Constitution and conflict with both the public
interest and the wishes of Congress. Additionally, the FCC rules put
at risk the lives of first responders and the public in the event of
a terrorist attack using a remote controlled improvised explosive
device (RCIED).
“To not allow first responders,
state and local law enforcement officers the option of using this
technology in the event of a terrorist threat or attack places the
physical safety of the public, as well as that of our protectors, in
jeopardy,” noted Howard Melamed, Founder and CEO of CellAntenna.
“This is about saving lives. Government Acts should further the
public interests and in a post-9/11 world, radio frequency jamming
technology is a crucially important tool in the fight against
terrorism.”
Section 302 of the FCA of 1934
limits the state and local use of cellular and radio jamming
devices, granting use of such equipment solely to the federal
government. While originally intended to preserve open airways
within the U.S., the current interpretations of the FCA prohibit
state and local emergency responders from arming themselves with
jamming equipment that could be used in the event of a terrorist
attack. CellAntenna argues that this position conflicts with the
2002 Homeland Security Act (HSA) on the need for emergency
responders to use new technologies to defend the U.S. against
terrorist threats. Radio Frequency jamming equipment obstructs radio
and cellular frequencies and prevents a device from receiving
signals. Increasingly, insurgent groups in Iraq and terrorist cells
abroad have begun to turn to cellular-triggered explosives as a
means of attacking civilian and military targets. Armed with
cellular jamming technology, emergency first responders – almost
always state and local personnel – could quickly eliminate risks
posed by cellular- or radio-triggered explosives and limit further
detonations immediately following an attack. The 1934 Act, however,
keeps state and local officials from having access to the
technology.
“The provisions of the 1934 Act and
FCC regulations that prohibit the sale of jamming devices to state
and local law enforcement agencies are not rationally related to
legitimate government interest, therefore violating the due process
clause of the 14th Amendment,” said Jeffrey Sarrow, Attorney for
CellAntenna. “In fact, these laws clearly conflict with the intent
of Congress as expressed in the HSA of 2002, which emphasizes the
need for local law enforcement agencies to acquire technology to
defend against terrorist threats.”
The FCC is responsible for the
commercial licensing of radio waves, and should not be involved in
determining whether state and local officials can use technology to
fight terrorism.
“There is no good reason that a
county Bomb Squad, such as we have here in Broward cannot obtain
whatever equipment it deems necessary to prevent a bomb from
detonating. Since remote control devices are used around the world
by terrorists, not having a jammer in the tool box of the Bomb Squad
is simply insane.” Melamed Said.
comments: Post
them by
clicking here
|